<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dating Over 40: Whip Appeal or Icing without the Cake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nevertoolate.biz/2008/09/03/whip-appeal-or-icing-without-the-cake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nevertoolate.biz/2008/09/03/whip-appeal-or-icing-without-the-cake/</link>
	<description>it's never too late for love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:27:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dating Goddess</title>
		<link>http://www.nevertoolate.biz/2008/09/03/whip-appeal-or-icing-without-the-cake/#comment-13544</link>
		<dc:creator>Dating Goddess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nevertoolate.biz/2008/09/03/whip-appeal-or-icing-without-the-cake/#comment-13544</guid>
		<description>Hi Ronnie:

Thanks for once again mentioning my blog. Cool!

It turned out the man in my blog entry and I had that chemistry we all say we want. But with all that alchemy, he still didn&#039;t make a point to call regularly or give me what I said I needed in a relationship. So whip appeal was purely sexual with him. And while the term implies he wants to please you, it turned out he only wanted to please me in one dimension of relationship. Thus my comment about watching what he does more than what he says.

I like your analogy to chem class. You can put a bunch of ingredients in a beaker and they can sit there or they can boil over. Or they can subtly mix together and turn into a different substance. But if you aren&#039;t watching closely, you may miss some important changes. Thus it is with a relationship. You have to pay attention to observe what&#039;s happening. It&#039;s hard to do when you&#039;re in the beaker!

Keep up your great work helping daters everywhere!

Dating Goddess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ronnie:</p>
<p>Thanks for once again mentioning my blog. Cool!</p>
<p>It turned out the man in my blog entry and I had that chemistry we all say we want. But with all that alchemy, he still didn&#8217;t make a point to call regularly or give me what I said I needed in a relationship. So whip appeal was purely sexual with him. And while the term implies he wants to please you, it turned out he only wanted to please me in one dimension of relationship. Thus my comment about watching what he does more than what he says.</p>
<p>I like your analogy to chem class. You can put a bunch of ingredients in a beaker and they can sit there or they can boil over. Or they can subtly mix together and turn into a different substance. But if you aren&#8217;t watching closely, you may miss some important changes. Thus it is with a relationship. You have to pay attention to observe what&#8217;s happening. It&#8217;s hard to do when you&#8217;re in the beaker!</p>
<p>Keep up your great work helping daters everywhere!</p>
<p>Dating Goddess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

